Hmmmm... Encountered this on a website. (Rhetorical, too rhetorical)

"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith, I am nothing."

- The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams

Interesting read, no? And the website went further and applied it this way. (You apply wat you learn mah!)

"I refuse to prove that my cables will make your system sound better", says the snake oil vendor, "for proof denies faith, and without faith, you will hear nothing."

He used it to explain high spending on cables. Hmmmm...

What if we use it to explain love?

"I refuse to prove my love for you", says Banedon, "for proof denies faith, and without faith, love is nothing."

Hmmmmm.... Because Christians believe in God, the first sentence above should be what keeps their faith going. So the 3rd sentence should make some sense. If they apply the 3rd sentence to themselves, does it makes christians easy to love? You dont have to prove your love for anything as they are a faithful bunch.

You can apply it to work too.

"I refuse to prove my competence", says the freaking slacker, "for proof denies faith, and without faith, whatever I do amounts to nothing."

Or maybe on God, in a 3rd person's perspective.

"I refuse to prove God's existence", says the Priest, "for proof denies faith, and without faith, God is nothing."

But then again, since when proof denies faith? Both cant exist for the same time?